Wow we certainly have some horrible choices this election , wheter one is democrat or republican the only CORRECT choice seems to be the lil box that says none of the above . WE all know why oprah is throwing her hat in obamas corner dont take rocket science there , But with his voting record one cannot go with oabma he says he didnt vote for the war and he is correct but then again he didnt for for it either , do we really want a president that cant make a desicion . He denies being muslem but how can he evade that with a middle name of hussien and his first years in school were at a terrorist backed school . Ameren was screwing the people of illnios over with increasing our power bills 300 percent , where was obama certainly not in illinois he was off campaigning instead . Hillory and her health care idea one which she has beem trying to shove down our necks since her husbands last term in office . why ?/ the answer is follow the dollar signs ! While big oil maybe contributors to the republican party one can see easily that big insurence is a major contributor to the demcrat party . Ther are certain words common with each candidate regarding health care that should make us all afraid very afraid . Insurence avilable for all citizens , AFFORDABLE , what is affordable for people living on a senators salary and the common cictizen are two very diffrent things indeed ! REQUIRED ahh now this is an insurence companies wet dream , make no mistake here insurence will rate everyone since they are having to take the good and bad risks lumped together . If you happen to be 20 years old and in perfect health and male it will be a good rate but now if you get older or have diseases like diabetes or haert conditions or a female of child bearing age you will pay dearly for that coverage and it will increase drastically as you get older . This is a nigtmare that can never be allowed to come to pass . Furthermore we have the issue of NAFTA which is due to expire in the next presendncy do you think HILLORY would kill her husbands pet project ? Can we afford to lose many more jobs because of bil clinton signing the nafta treaty ? JUst a lil point of interest the success of the bill clinton presendentcy wasnt due to bill but instaed due to the congress being controlled by the republicans .

So if you vote demcrat for congress then dont be stupid and vote democrat for president we have to have checks and balances

Many people vote simply on what is happening in their personal lives has to be the presidents fault right ? VOTE WITH YOUR HEADS engage the brain . Sure we are in an unpopular war right now and have high gas prices but will that change , nope ! The islamic threat is very real and will be with us for generations to come .

lisa

[IP ADDRESS:76.206.18.88 ]

SO... i wrote to "Lisa" at her email address deedee9703@sbcglobal.net saying:

Thanks for spamming my site with your political crap. by the way... you spelled HILLARY wrong, "lisa"

GOT A DELIGHTFUL RESPONSE (i copied and pasted it directly into the post... complete with spaces and errors...*shudder*):

In a message dated 2/7/2008 4:27:37 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, deedee9703@sbcglobal.net writes:



Giggles ahh so thats what democrats call the truth . The truth is never spam ,hon , get away from the democratic brainwashing machine and your head will clear and you too shall see . Btw hillary doesnt get the respect to get a capitol in front of her name let alone be spelled right .

huggs lisa

MY EYES WERE STARTING TO BLEED FROM THE LACK OF CONCERN TOWARDS SPELLING.

so i responded -- as nicely as i could:

no. your diatribe on MY site is spam. get your own blog so you can blather on and on.

punches and strangles,

gc

AND DON'TCHA KNOW IT.... I GOT A RESPONSE....

In a message dated 2/7/2008 2:14:03 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, deedee9703@sbcglobal.net writes:

hey if you cant take the heat of debate then your mising the point of a blog keep it shove it by the way i and 1000 freinds link to your blog you just lost that many readers so now you have entered insignificant realm . people like you are too stupid to vote for more than a stick of gum anyway .

hugs lisa

SOOOOOOO... BECAUSE I COULDN'T CARE LESS ABOUT THIS ONE, I RESPONDED:

totally fine if i lose people like you.

that's fine. i'm pretty sure that you aren't exactly intelligent enough to comprehend my site, dolt.

maybe since you won't be spending time reading my site, you can crack open a dictionary.

strangles,
GC

GOT ANOTHER RESPONSE...

In a message dated 2/7/2008 3:15:14 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, deedee9703@sbcglobal.net writes:

hey maybe you can crack open a 1rst grade reader whiner . so stop you democrat whining and go crawl back under the toad stool you came from . your just mad because i exposed the lil democrat drivle you have on your site . now run along lil one before i get serious with this , be warned

realy well my readers dont think so and i have alot more than yu sweety i do have my own blog and can simply mirror your every post till yours is no more, pumpkin . debunking it and making it insignificant , shall we play ?? hey i have a novel idea why dont you get back on your hamster wheel and try to work off some of that huge caboose sweety . and its a bigun

huggs lisa

YEP, I SENT AN EMAIL BACK:

hahah... yeah OOOOOOKAY. what exactly did you "expose" on my site... other than the fact that you are a complete moron with the mentality of a fetus in a 3rd world country?

"be warned"? ohhhhhh big words from a psychotic nutbag such as yourself.

UPDATE: BY THE WAY... I FOUND HER LITTLE B.S. BLOG.... on Yahoo 360: http://360.yahoo.com/profile-.HM2vww1fqOTmFQ38WFxAHsL2ji43n7jr8n.HRka5As-?cq=1

oooooh. i'm **shaking**

now, you might be wondering why i am posting this if i "couldn't care less"... let's just say with the gigglemom crap and the fact that i'm due for the friend next week, mixed with the fact that i just wanted to break away from posting about "hospital watch 2008", i figured that this was good for the soul.

sooooooo... darnit, i guess those "1000 freinds" that she has linking to my site won't be clicking through any more.

by the way... i didn't read through whatever the fuck she wrote in that original post... all i saw were the spelling errors and the "Hillory" and said to myself... "oh! lookie! we've got a live one here!"

enjoy.

(and those of you who DO comment, I respect your opinions. It's just when someone posts a comment to an entry from a month ago and rambles on with a 1000 word commentary, it agitates me... not to mention that she must've hit the "submit" button about 10 times and i had to delete the duplicates.)

yeah there's more. "Lisa" replied back -- the most frightening part of all this is that it seems to have reproduced somehow:

In a message dated 2/7/2008 4:08:14 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, deedee9703@sbcglobal.net writes:

hehe if nothing else your semi funny to argue with kinda like arguing with a kindergartener . btw my 4 year old uses bigger words and holds a more intelligent arguement than you . thats the problem with you dumbocrats , truth stares you in the face and you get your panties in a bunch . hey you better stop it before you go on a binge eating spell , ive already seen two cows running down the road screaming for their lives . yelling "watch out lady with fork and knife lumbering down behind us " , they was pretty sure they could outrun you giggles ! btw your not losing weight when the needle makes one lap before stopping on a figure . oh pardon im sorry "figure" hehe i bet you dont remember having one of those . btw beached whale is not a form of figure . are you stomping/walking around now i thought i felt the earth shiver a bit .

[THEN IT ADDED A BUNCH OF "QUOTES" IN THE EMAIL - you can gloss over these... not important - IT thinks that i give a shit about what it thinks about politics]
I found these quotes and think they are very interesting.
It seems to me that the real point made in the following article [is or should be] that when leaders of both parties have shared the same point of view over this long a period of time. It's time to stop the adolescent and obviously politically motivated finger pointing..
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That
is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We
want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal
here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear,
chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times
since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,
1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.
Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate,
air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to
the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he
has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi
(D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton
Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam
continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a
licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten
the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bush, Signed by
Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction
and the means of delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19,
2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in
power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd
(D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority
to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
that a deadly ****nal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,
2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every
significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
refused to do" - Rep.Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that
Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has
also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda
members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will
continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare,
and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton
(D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for
the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob
Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction...
So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

TO WHICH I'VE REPLIED:

enjoy my blog, freak. good luck finding a suit made of skin.

maybe IT misses it's penis.

AH! A RETORT FROM THE BOY/GIRL:

In a message dated 2/7/2008 5:24:49 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, deedee9703@sbcglobal.net writes:


think ill just post that lil comment on my blog that should be sufficient enough for yours to self destruct ,maybe you will have more time to work off the blubber then

hahah... listen, Mister, i've dealt with idiots like you before on my site for the past 8 years. Don't get too cocky by thinking that you're about to make me "self destruct".

AND A RESPONSE (8pm Thursday night) FROM IT:

In a message dated 2/7/2008 7:59:31 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, deedee9703@sbcglobal.net writes:


yep i can bet that and you should too , i can get that cocky because i can do exactly what i say guess it's easy for you to deal with people like me , people whom have the right outlooks on life people whom do hold college degrees , you attack them when their opinion differs from yours . asine narrow minded simple people like you are the problem with our country today , not whatever president we have because whatever happens in your little insignificant thing you call your life , whatever it is that goes wrong , you will need someone else to blame it upon . hehehe if you think in your wildest dreams that by calling me mister you are insulting me you have to get alot better than that . ive been called worse by much better people . just look at you trying so hard to fit the image of slim go ahead go look in the mirror . what do you see? fat here fat there , generaly an ugly person in mind and body , while your at it read what a post -op transsexaul is . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2EV3w2QxII

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/USA_TRANSGENDER_GIRLS/message/19

Re: hi , i need help, i want to be a girl

hi all nice group !
one thing though that i see that makes me cringe and that is the
simple statement "i want to be a girl" . evryone wants something
that is unattainable . i want to be a millionaire but doubtfull that
will happen . upon starting out on my personal journey i confided in
a gentic girlfriend and she asked a simple question after i spilled
my guts out to her in tears , she says so your saying you wanna be a
girl or are you saying you are a girl . to which i replied that i was
a girl i just wanted to be complete like other girls . she hugged me
and accepted me right away . she said if i had said i wanna be a girl
instaed she would have said too bad your not and would have looked at
me differently . this demands an immediate and determined commitment
the giving up of a former male life almost in its entirity except for
that which could be for either gender and the commitment to a now new
fem life and lifestlye and its newfound pleasures and
disappointments .
the male mind has a slanted view of that which is fem or not and
too often one will see those that have slipped thru and in realityy
are people that are living a fetish .
estrogen and/or phyto estrogens make changes in you , the brain
irrereversably changed (you will think like a girl in almost all that
matters and especially in what would matter to a girl) you grow
breast hehe yours to keep or have sugically removed , your body fat
redistributes itself into a more femm shape and you lose much of your
upper body strenght . people begin to see due to their hardwiring a
girl . lastly yor ability ot function as a man maybe be gone maybe
forever even if you stop taking estrogen , you will never be as manly
as you once were again .
Think long then hard and then seek professional help what you
percieve as transsexuality could be simply nothing more than
transvestism .
my advice a lil something that creates no harm no foul is a short
real life test conducted on your own . i suggest a minimum of two
weeks lived entirly in the fem role 24-7 usually when one has taken a
vacation away from work and freinds and family . one has to go on at
least two dates with a gentlemean and one has to be out and about no
hiding behind a closed door . mainstream poplation only . if you can
get past that then for sure seek out a good therapist .
definitions
transvestite = can only fantisize about being a woman for a short
time and has no desire to be a woman although his fetish may make him
think he does .
transsexual - can only learn and experience living in the fem role as
close as mediacal scienec allows .
woman- only a woman knows what its like to be a woman

BASICALLY, I THINK SHE'S IT'S JUST A FRUITCAKE